David T. Lewis wrote:
> Sorry for spamming the list with a lot of small updates today, but
> it was a snow day here in Michigan so I took the day off, brewed up
> some coffee and went to work on MVC reloadability. One more snowstorm
> should easily be enough to finish the job :)

Hey, more power to you! (let's hope the snow keeps up for just a little 
while longer :) I had one funny effect when I updated which was that 
suddenly tons of transcripts popped open due to the order in which some 
packages were loaded. I issued a config map to bring the packages in the 
right order and prevent this issue.

Cheers,
   - Andreas

> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:38:32AM -0500, David T. Lewis wrote:
>> For reloadable MVC, I am looking at MVC dependencies in other packages.
>> The classes in Morphic-FileList that all seem to belong elsewhere. It
>> looks to me like the following package changes would make sense, but
>> I'd like to ask for feedback before moving any of them.
>>
>> Proposed moves from Morphic-FileList:
>>
>> Move two MVC views to ST80
>>   move ModalSystemWindowView to package ST80-Views
>>   move PluggableFileListView to package ST80-Pluggable View
>>
>> Move three file list models that may be used in either MVC or Morphic
>>   move FileList to package Tools-FileList
>>   move FileList2 to package Tools-FileList
>>   move PluggableFileList to package Tools-FileList
>>
>> Two file selection menus that many be used in either MVC or Morphic
>>   move StandardFileMenu to package Tools-Menus
>>   move StandardFileMenuResult to package Tools-Menus
>>
>> Does the above look right? And can anyone think of anything that
>> would be broken by such a packaging change?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
> 
>