On 03.01.2010, at 19:46, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 03.01.2010, at 15:31, Andreas Raab wrote:
> >
> > Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> On 03.01.2010, at 15:06, Andreas Raab wrote:
> >>> K. K. Subramaniam wrote:
> >>>> On Saturday 02 January 2010 07:02:10 pm Andreas Raab wrote:
> >>>>> if you want the full list please download the image and refer to the full summary in the "What's new" window. And if people disagree with this policy I'd be happy to change it again - I'm just trying to cut down on the spam factor a little. So let me know what you think.
> >>>> Brief entries in mail helps people searching online. Is it possible to make "What's new" accessible to search engines too?
> >>> We could post it on the board blog if the board agrees.
> >>> Would that be useful?
> >> I'd rather put it near the download page as change log.
> >
> > The advantage with the blog is more external visibility. Since the board blog is aggregated, we allow people to see progress in Squeak who are not on the Squeak mailing list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  - Andreas
> >
> 
> Meinetwegen ;)
> 
> Alle beide?
> 
> (I'm using the excellent and free BeoLingus German-English dictionary in its Mac form)


Hmm, can't reverse-translate what you meant there. What I wrote meant roughly "go ahead, I don't mind".

- Bert -


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100104/0407b20f/attachment.htm