[squeak-dev] Re: Package unload status

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Jan 6 02:15:07 UTC 2010


Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> 
> Good to know. It's funny that every fork has MIT license, but not squeak.
> 

Well, we do. The problem we're facing is that we need the SFC lawyers to 
agree that we've *proven* that we're fully MIT relicensed. And we just 
don't want to announce the (MIT relicensed) 4.0 without also announcing 
our joining the SFC which is what creates the delay.

BTW, the process is moving along. Slowly, but definitely moving.

Cheers,
   - Andreas



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list