[squeak-dev] Future sends
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Wed Jan 6 16:21:43 UTC 2010
On 18.12.2009, at 19:58, Josh Gargus wrote:
>
>> messages and that any #future: messages sent with the same delay should be queued in the order they are sent.
>
> Without question. This is a limitation of the current implementation.
Thinking about this, I'd suspect using #addAlarm:withArguments:for:at: instead of #addDeferredUIMessage: might be both more efficient and possibly order-preserving. It uses a Heap to sort future message sends.
- Bert -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100106/3204d9b0/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|