On 24 Jan 2010, at 19:19, Andreas Raab wrote:

> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> 2010/1/24 keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> I look forward to seeing trunk with MC1.5 then, cool
>> if you remember, i already raised this topic here and in Pharo list.
>> The problem is, that (as you pointing in another thread about
>> capturing knowledge), there's no one left,
>> having such knowledge about MC 1.5., to do such integration.
>
> We did the experiment earlier:
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-October/140345.html
>
> The problem is that MC 1.5 and 1.6 appear to be buggy in various  
> areas and don't appear ready for prime time.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas

I have been using them for years now without trouble.

How you cope with the old MC I dont know. I cant use it, it looses  
overides, and you have to maintain a separate image for every package  
you contribute to.

MC1.6 should be less buggy, if traits support was finished.

Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100124/aba316d7/attachment.htm