[squeak-dev] Re: SqueakMap Community Account? (was: About Configurations)

Andreas Raab andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Jul 16 02:48:31 UTC 2010


Hi Chris -

I don't want to keep raising bars here but one other issue with SM is 
lack of dependencies. There needs to be *some* way to provide dependency 
information if we want to make it easy to install things. That is, 
unless we assume that anything that has 'real' dependencies is done 
using Metacello?

Cheers,
   - Andreas

On 7/15/2010 1:36 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
> Andreas wrote:
>
>> Well, I don't *think* of it as SqueakMap but the comparison is somewhat
>> appropriate. The main reason why I don't think of it as SM is that SM wants
>> to be "all packages ever created for Squeak" but what we need is "all
>> packages that we've actually tested to work in this image".
>
> Every version of every SqueakMap package declares which image version
> it is for.  In fact, it even includes additional tags such as whether
> it makes any modifications to that base image.
>
> Currently, there is no 4.2 entry in SqueakMap so, regardless of the
> quality of this tag for past versions, there is an opportunity for,
> going forward, to simply *test it* before posting it...
>
> Not that that should really matter, given usual (MIT) license which
> completely denies fitness for a particular puporse..
>
>> And of course
>> there are some other differences (like community ownership instead of
>> individual ownership of the catalog elements)
>
> To put this shallow shortcoming to rest, I have a mind to create a new
> SqueakMap account called, "Community" and announce the password for it
> here on this list:  "squeak"...
>
> We can take charge behind the scenes to add "Community" as a
> co-maintainer of all existing SqueakMap projects.  We can then
> announce, on this list, "if you don't want your package to be
> community-maintaintable, then remove Community as a co-maintainer."
>
> Any unrepresented projects will, therefore, not have a advocate to
> remove it and therefore keep  Community account as a co-maintainer.
>
>> but other than that I agree;
>
> That's it then?  Cool!!  Let's breakout the SqueakMap!  :-D
>
>   - Chris
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list