On 2010/07/27 10:38, Andreas Raab wrote:
> On 7/27/2010 1:33 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:
>> So if one wanted to implement some of the stranger records - NAPTR
>> springs to mind - one would just hack DnsRecord>>readFrom: and add an
>> appropriate case, yes? (For NAPTR (RFC 2915) that's 35).
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
>> (SIP uses NAPTR records as part of its lookup mechanism, defined in RFC
>> 3263 SIP: Locating SIP Servers.)
>
> Sweet! I had no idea. Josh will be glad to hear that I think :-)

I really ought to revive my sadly-dormant SIP stack on SS.

>> The attached OUGHT to do it. I don't know of any public servers that
>> user NAPTR *cough* and I'd need to look up local names to properly test
>> against my local test setup.
>
> Yes, I'll try to implement the primitive on Windows sometime soon.

I'll definitely try it out when you've had a go.

frank