On 2010/06/16 21:48, Richard Durr wrote:
> I think CogVM will probably not be released to the public.

I think there are only two people (Andreas, Eliot) on the list who are 
in a position to speak pronounce on the matter, but with that out the 
way the most recent thing that I recall reading is this:

http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-April/148987.html

Relevant snippet:

       Squeak 4.1 includes the closure implementation from Cog as a
       prerequisite for full Cog adoption later.

frank

> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Torsten Bergmann<astares at gmx.de>  wrote:
>> Andreas wrote (in another thread)
>>> WIW, when I saw this code I got reminded how positively ancient and
>>> unused it is and gave it a thumbs-down. There has been no use for this
>>> code in ten years, and there will be no use for it in Cog, so it's gone
>>> now.
>>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> any news on the Cog VM?
>>
>> Last time Göran asked (see [1]) there was no answer ... but
>> maybe it is possible to get some more infos about the state of the project.
>>
>> Elliots blog http://www.mirandabanda.org/cogblog/
>> wasnt updated since 2009 and I can imagine the community is
>> highly interested in any further information you or Elliot
>> are allowed to share.
>>
>> Thx
>> T.
>>
>> [1] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2010-January/003599.html