[squeak-dev] Re: SmalltalkImage current vs. Smalltalk

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 22:00:26 UTC 2010


So, looks like we having a good consensus?
/me always happy when it happens :)

On 2 March 2010 23:56, Nicolas Cellier
<nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/3/2 keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>:
>>
>> Smalltalk host windowSystem
>>
>> Smalltalk host platformName
>>
>> Smalltalk host osVersion
>>
>> Smalltalk commandLine vmPath.
>>
>> Smalltalk commandLine imagePath.
>>
>> Smalltalk commandLine documentPath.
>>
>> Smalltalk commandLine optionNumber: 2.
>>
>> Smalltalk commandLine optionAt: 2.
>>
>> Not every protocol has to be implemented by a different class.
>> I asked earlier about a name for the StartupManager. StartupManager would
>> happily handle #commandLine and probably #host as well.
>> Keith
>>
>>
>
> Sure, implementation detail.
> Quite sure Squeak/Cuis/Pharo/... wouldhave different implementations.
>
> Nicolas
>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list