[squeak-dev] Re: Object>>#is:? (was: Re: PackageDependencyTest)
Juan Vuletich
juan at jvuletich.org
Thu Mar 4 20:45:03 UTC 2010
Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>> ...
> If #is: implementation has to reflect a class hierarchy, then I don't
> see how it can be any better than #isKindOf: and #isMemberOf:
In my opinion, it does not have to reflect a class hierarchy at all, but
conformance to some protocol. Take a look at
http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/Drafts/2009/essay.pdf .
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|