El sáb, 06-03-2010 a las 07:41 +0100, Michael Haupt escribió:
> Miguel,
> 
> Am 05.03.2010 um 23:12 schrieb Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez <miguel.coba at gmail.co 
> m>:
> > I just answered this thread because someone said that Etoys
> > will never be included in Pharo,
> 
> I never said that. Just re-read.
> 

umm, but you said:

"Would the Pharo community like to include Etoys? I doubt
it, so the Pharo community will have little incentive to drive
interoperability in this particular regard."

and I answered that if etoys was a real package in less that a day it
would have a ConfigurationOfXXX and be as loadable in Pharo as in
Squeak, so that Pharo users that care can use it, and Pharo users that
don't care don't have it imposed by the base image.
Pharo users don't have nothing in particular against etoys, just we
don't want it in the base image, but as a loadable package.


> >
> Best,
> 
> Michael

-- 
Miguel Cobá
http://miguel.leugim.com.mx