On 03/10/2010 05:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> What the starting point is will depend on to what extent Cog has
>> been open sourced  (Teleplace may choose to open source
>> single-threaded Cog initially, keeping back the threaded FFI for
>> a while, it may not open source Cog at all; we'll see :) ).
> May be I the only one to notice the:)   which I have problem to
> understand since for me it announces that COG may not be
> open-source.

Isn't this what you wanted to allow companies to do, when you chose the
MIT license?  I don't understand, why should you care?

I see some irony...

Paolo