>>>
>>> Come on now, the majority of what you write is to insist that your  
>>> way will be better.
>>
>> Not at all, I have two main points... 1) the board has no  
>> constitution, and 2) trunk is the worst possible process you could  
>> have chosen, because
>>
>> a) it isn't a process it is an excuse to group-hack a monolithic  
>> image
>> b) the philosophy behind trunk is the opposite of where we want to  
>> go, monolithic vs support all forks with a kernel you can build on.
>> c) moving targets are the worst possible scenario.
>> d) it uses tools that are too high level.
>> e) it is release a year rather then release a month
>> f) it relies on an elite to manage it
>> g) it closes out people who cant change things without breaking it.
>
> Ha ha.  We really aren't on the same wavelength, are we?  You state  
> that "trunk is the worst possible process" because it  has negative  
> characteristics a,b,c,d,e,f,g.  It goes without saying that you  
> believe that your process does not share these characteristics.   
> Simple logic dictates that if trunk is the worst then yours is  
> better, and if therefore you insist that trunk is the worst, then  
> you are also insisting that yours is better.

I am saying that anything else would be better, since my process  
qualifies as being anything, I guess you are right.

Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100313/5c836060/attachment.htm