On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 23:09, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> IMO, it is useful when looking at an object to see its more general
> attributes first.  For example, the "name" of the object would be near
> the top, since that would be in the superclass.  Presenting the
> general instVars first also suggests or implies the abstract
> (superclass) behaviors that might be provided by the object, prior to
> the (subclass) vars which may serve only very specific purposes.


I agree that this might be of some value if you have a single inspector on
an object, but as I tried to point out, does not help while debugging.

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100323/e582721b/attachment.htm