Thanks for reviewing.

Sorry you don't like the formatting, you are welcome to change it to
your preference.  I do use a pretty print enhanced to employ the
Rectangular-Block formatting pattern (which, IIRC, does actually make
an exception for Integer>>#to:by:do:, but this printer is not
sophisticated enough to make that exception, sorry)..


On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>
>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Trunk:
>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-cmm.404.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Collections-cmm.404
>> Author: cmm
>> Time: 11 November 2010, 11:08:07.979 am
>> UUID: f4fd12e0-266e-4e95-a4ac-b2064707494c
>> Ancestors: Collections-ul.403
>>
>> Introduced WeakOrderedCollection.
>
> There are two unnecessary methods: WeakOrderedCollection >> #new: and
> WeakOrderedCollection >> #new:withAll:.
>
> Shouldn't WeakOrderedCollection be in the Collections-Weak category like all
> other weak collections?
>
> Are you using the prettyprinter to format the methods? Some of your changes
> (#to:do: #to:by:do:) take a lot more time for me to understand in this
> format. And it reminds me to what the prettyprinter does.
>
>
> Levente
>
> snip
>
>