The question is - are we going for a core image with trunk or for a
developer image?

Depending on that answer it is no or yes.....

If I remember well at the last board meeting it was decided to go for
a core image.

In that case we would need just a script how to load it in the help
system or in the 'How to extend the system' workspace.

Or put it another way - we really need the Hudson build server soon
which produces a  core image (Nightly build) and a developer
image...... Alexander L.?

--Hannes

On 10/8/10, Casey Ransberger <casey.obrien.r at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. I'd have it in our "development" image in a heartbeat. Not in a
> core/unloaded image, though.
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:24 AM, "Torsten Bergmann" <astares at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> thanks to Levent tab completion returned to Squeak (see [1])
>> and I still wonder how the community feels about having
>> this by default installed into the standard Squeak image.
>>
>> Pharo has it too (not in the stripped down PharoCore image but
>> the release image with all dev tools)
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Thx
>> Torsten
>>
>> [1] http://news.squeak.org/2010/10/07/tab-completion-returns-to-squeak/
>> --
>> GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 &euro;/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit
>> gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>>
>
>