[squeak-dev] failing to build a vm on Windows

George Herolyants george.herolyants at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 18:19:19 UTC 2010


That's what I meant by "fully equivalent" :) Thanks!

2010/9/4 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, George Herolyants
> <george.herolyants at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Eliot.
>>
>> 2010/9/4 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>> > Have you tried building a Cog VM recently?  The advantage this has is
>> > that
>> > everything you need to build is already in the svn repository.
>> >
>> > See http://www.squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/Cog/cygwinbuild/HowToBuild
>>
>> Great! I'm sorry, I didn't follow the Cog discussion tightly, is it
>> fully equivalent to the "regular" squeak vm regarding plugins?
>
> What do you mean by "fully equivalent"?  You should be able to build any
> regular plugin against Cog and apart from things like the
> UnixOSProcessPlugin they should work.  But the proof is in the pudding.
> Eliot
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> George
>>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list