On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:41:13PM -0400, Florin Mateoc wrote:
>  On 9/10/2010 11:08 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> > On 9/10/2010 6:26 PM, Florin Mateoc wrote:
> >> What!? You don't like my meaning-conveying open1 ? :)
> >
> > He, he :-)
> >
> >> Seriously now, I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I do have a slight reservation. The 'debugger' part of the
> >> name is more the 'what for' than the 'what' of what we are doing. There could be other clients that want to use the same
> >> thing: in VW there is SyntaxError, which is not quite a debugger. Furthermore, from the point of view of an MVC
> >> developer there is already a known protocol 'open', which the toolBuilder implements, as well as a protocol
> >> openNoTerminate. Now granted, for the Morphic developer this is not as intuitive.
> >
> > Well, we could do openNoTerminate but I find it just a little opaque. But I'm good with either one; your's and David's
> > call, just let me know which way you prefer.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >   - Andreas
> >
> >
> 
> As I said, I also don't have a strong opinion, so it's up to Dave

"ToolBuilder>>openDebugger: aSpec" sounds fine to me.

Dave