> it just that we disagree about whether it is beneficial
> to be able to use
> obj, obj
> instead of
> { obj. obj }
>
> i happen to think the opposite (i.e. not beneficial)
> because it is not universal. i.e. it makes a difference
> string , object
> object , object
>
> results in two different behaviours.

I agree, it looks akward and hackish to me too; a step backward from the 
nice API for collections we currently have.

Just my 2 cents of course...

Stef