[squeak-dev] New Trunk Image: 10548

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Thu Sep 23 09:29:02 UTC 2010


I'm surprised too.

I can see the point - long-running tests, well, take too long. Could we 
have some kind've warning though? "35 long-running tests not run."

frank

On 2010/09/22 16:25, Casey Ransberger wrote:
> Wait, what? The second time you run, you get less tests?
>
> That's completely counter intuitive. Tests should never affect future runs... seems like someone left off a tearDown method somewhere.
>
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Levente Uzonyi<leves at elte.hu>  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>
>>> On 2010/09/22 10:53, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>> On 2010/09/22 09:31, Frank Shearar wrote:
>>>>> On 2010/09/22 05:31, Casey Ransberger wrote:
>>>>>> Grab it here: http://ftp.squeak.org/trunk/Squeak4.2-10548-alpha.zip
>>>
>>> OK, new experiment:
>>> * Start up the image,
>>> * Run all tests,
>>> * Run all tests _again_.
>>>
>>> The failing Decompiler tests now all pass.
>>
>> No they don't. They just don't run, because those are LongTestCases and there's a test, which turns off the preference that enables the running of LongTestCases. So after the first run, the preference is off, therefore LongTestCases won't be run the second time.
>>
>>
>> Levente
>>
>>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list