Colin Putney-3 wrote:
> 
> ..
> The thing is, I don't think putting Smalltalk code on Github would
> actually be useful. Github is deeply oriented to versioning files.  Sure,
> it's possible to map Smalltalk code into files, but there's always an
> impedance mismatch there, and file-oriented tools tend not to be good for
> working with Smalltalk code. If all you want is a remote server that you
> can push to and pull from, ok, that would probably work. But Github, the
> web app, is probably less useful. We'll see what SmalltalkHub is like, but
> I have much higher hopes for that than something based on git.
> 

We'll all have to wait and see I guess.  Given that Smalltalk is more and
more used in web application development I reckon SmalltalkHub should be
able to handle non-smalltalk resources like images, javascript files, css
etc too.

Just out of curiosity, what are the hopes for SmalltalkHub?

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/SmalltalkHub-tp3433581p3436336.html
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.