On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Michal <michal-list at auf.net> wrote:

> Also, I recall that Avi had made a number of attempts at having an
> image saved in a forked background process, eg
>
>  http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2005-October/095547.html
>
> did anybody pick up on this, or did anything come out of it?

Yeah, we used that extensively for DabbleDB and it worked great. I
don't remember if we solved the GC issue or if we just lived with it,
though.

Colin