On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting naming scheme; is that something we should "document" in
> MCVersionName?
>
> Also, just to clarify our words, MC _does_ support branches in the
> domain, just not names for them.  But in terms of the ancestry, you
> can unlimited branching, which could be rendered if the tools were
> improved to do that..  Adding a name to something can often be done
> via external annotation, notwithstanding this naming scheme..

Well, actually, it supports names for branches as well. The problem is
that it doesn't have a "branch" command, so there's no way to discover
the naming convention for branches. You just have to know.