On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

>
> On 18.04.2011, at 17:08, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/18/11 8:02 AM, "Hannes Hirzel" <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Edgar
>>>>
>>>> thank you for the added info and the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Before we go further into this, let me ask first.
>>>>
>>>> In which way is it a problem that Morphic depends on Monticello?
>>>
>>> Monticello depends on Morphic as his code is today..
>>> So, if in the future you wish get rid of Morphic and unload it and instead
>>> use other UI like SimpleMorphic , you must change all references to Morphic
>>> classes like MeNuMorph, AlignmentMorph, etc.
>>
>> Bert mentioned that MC was fully toolbuilderized, so this problem was solved. We should check that solution first IMHO.
>
> MC has both. If it detects ToolBuilder it uses that, otherwise it constructs a Morphic UI on its own (incidentally using its own toolbuilder-like framework).

So we should either remove those parts, or move them to a new package, say 
Monticello-Morphic.


Levente

>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>