There is only one possibly correct answer which is raising 
BlockCannotReturn, because we're trying to return while we're in the 
midst of returning already, so there is no place to return to. That 
answer is implemented by the attached change set.

BTW, the code duplication between ContextPart>>restart 
ContextPart>>resume:, ContextPart>>unwindTo:, and Process>>terminate 
bothers me greatly. The change set only fixes one of these locations 
(the one triggered by your problem statement) but having such critical 
code duplicated all over the places can't be good. Any takers?

Cheers,
   - Andreas

On 12/2/2011 15:18, Tobias Pape wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> given the following class:
>
> Object subclass: #Foo
>          instanceVariableNames: ''
>          classVariableNames: ''
>          poolDictionaries: ''
>          category: 'Foo'!
> a
>          self b: [^ 1].! !
>
> b: aBlock
>
>          [self c: aBlock] ensure: [^ 2].
>
> c: aBlock
>
>          aBlock value.
>          ^ 3
>
> And you would do
>
> Foo new a
>
> what would you expect?
>
> I am very curious.
> Please, first guess, then execute.
>
> Best
> 	-Tobias
>
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ContextPart-resume.st
Type: application/x-st
Size: 855 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20111202/543c781c/ContextPart-resume.bin