On 05.01.2011, at 12:03, Bernhard Pieber wrote:

> It just occurred to me that the broken tests can be fixed if the following is put to the trunk as a postscript or preamble:
> 
> PackageOrganizer default
> 	unregisterPackageNamed: 'PackageInfo';
> 	unregisterPackageNamed: 'ToolBuilder';
> 	unregisterPackageNamed: 'Morphic-TrueType'
> 
> That might be less controversial than forcing #flushObsoletePackageInfos on every image. Bert?

Maybe PackageDependencyTest should be made less whiny? By default it should not complain about those packages. You only want to ensure that a release image is clean, not every working image.

Perhaps unit tests aren't the best way to ensure a clean release. They're supposed to exercise code. ReleaseBuilder does some sanity checks already, maybe it should also check for clean packages.

- Bert -

> Am 05.01.2011 um 11:30 schrieb Bernhard Pieber:
>> Yes, there seems to have gone something wrong. Tests-bp.99 only changed 8 methods in PackageDependencyTest. And it breaks PackageDependencyTest for trunk images unless you have done an aggressive #cleanUp: before. See my recent e-mail:
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2011-January/156359.html
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Bernhard
>> 
>> Am 05.01.2011 um 08:39 schrieb Levente Uzonyi:
>>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, commits at source.squeak.org wrote:
>>>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Tests to project The Trunk:
>>>> http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Tests-cmm.106.mcz
>>>> 
>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>> 
>>>> Name: Tests-cmm.106
>>>> Author: cmm
>>>> Time: 4 January 2011, 3:37:28.658 pm
>>>> UUID: efe56bcb-0939-4f58-b8ee-73d6a99dbe2a
>>>> Ancestors: Tests-cmm.105, Tests-bp.99
>>>> 
>>>> Merged Tests-bp.99.
>>> 
>>> Accidentally there's a lot of cruft besides the actual changes which are the side effects of running the tests. I guess those should be removed/reverted.
> 
>