[squeak-dev] help needed with the new FFI plugin...

karl ramberg karlramberg at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 12:55:08 UTC 2011


What about the Physical Etoys project ?
http://tecnodacta.com.ar/gira/projects/physical-etoys/

Karl

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

>
> On 22.07.2011, at 02:10, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 22 July 2011 02:34, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >     today I committed the threaded FFI plugin along with the threaded
> VM and
> > > hope to be able to support people in doing threaded FFI work on the x86
> > > platforms really soon now (Esteban, amongst others, this means you ;)
> ).
> > >  But to put the image-level code that uses the new FFI plugin into
> > > production the standard VM needs to be upgraded to not crash with the
> > > ExternalFunction image changes the new threaded FFI plugin wants.  The
> main
> > > change is that ExternalFunction changes size, gaining a stackSize inst
> var
> > > which is used to tell the FFI plugin how much stack spacer to reserve
> for
> > > marshalling (its computed on first use).  The best way for this to
> happen is
> > > to start using the ThreadedFFIPlugin as the standard plugin in the
> > > Interpreter VM. The ThreadedFFIPlugin overall is simpler than the old
> FFI
> > > plugin (no assembler support code) and better (fully reentrant).  But
> for
> > > this to happen we may need to implement the platform=specific parts of
> > > the ThreadedFFIPlugin (still entirely Smalltalk code) for PowerPC and
> ARM
> > > (and perhaps others, SPARC??).  I understand what has to be done and I
> can
> > > explain it to anyone interested in working on the problem, but I don't
> have
> > > any hardware with which I can test the results so its pretty pointless
> my
> > > doing the work and producing something inevitably broken.  So are there
> > > people out there who would be interested in doing the port to PPC and
> ARM?
> > >  It means fleshing out the classes
> > >     ThreadedARMFFIPlugin ThreadedFFICalloutStateForARM
> > >     ThreadedPPCBEFFIPlugin ThreadedFFICalloutStateForPPC
> > > and having a solid understanding of how alloca works to do stack
> allocation
> > > and how the ABIs on ARM and PPC pass registers.
> > > here's hoping there are a few good low-level people who would be
> interested.
> > > Let me know.
> >
> > I wonder if you find anyone today using these archs, not saying using
> > squeak/pharo on them + knowing low-level details + wanting to help :)
> >
> > Right, chances are thin.  But then if no one is interested then the work
> doesn't need to be done.  Bert, you mentioned the other day that PPC was
> still relevant for etoys.  But am I right in thinking etoys never uses the
> FFI?
>
> Right. Etoys should run on both ARM and PPC, but it does not use FFI.
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110722/d57a2234/attachment.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list