On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:20:53PM -0600, Miguel Cob? wrote:
> Great work, thanks.
> 
> A suggestion, why don't follow a common pattern to name the
> Pharo/Squeak/Gemstone specific code for package XXX with the format:
> 
> XXX-Squeak
> 
> so that the packages be:
> 
> XXX-dtl.123.mcz
> XXX-Squeak-dtl.123.mcz
> XXX-Pharo-dtl.123.mcz
> 
> This way if a Metacello configuration is created for this package it
> will pull the corresponding dependency for tha platform where is being
> installed.
> 
> Cheers.
> 

That's a good idea, although at this point I'm not sure which bits
are Pharo or Squeak specific. Most of the extensions in the SMx
package that I referred to as "Squeak-specific" are from Juan's
change sets that he did for the Pharo integration, so hopefully
the differences will not be too great.

Thanks,
Dave