[squeak-dev] OpenQwaq is open!
Ken G. Brown
kbrown at mac.com
Tue May 3 18:20:15 UTC 2011
At 11:06 AM -0700 5/3/11, Josh Gargus apparently wrote:
>Yay Teleplace!! It's great to see this code in the open!
>
>And boo to everyone who complains about the license without first saying "Yay Teleplace!!". Personally, I would also prefer the MIT license to the GPL. However, the whining and the sense of entitlement is a bit much. Teleplace owes you nothing, and Teleplace's investors owe you even less.
I'd say both Teleplace and their Investors owe a tremendous debt to both the originators of Squeak and the community, without which they would still be trying to get something going.
Ken
>
>Full disclosure: I was a Qwaq/Teleplace employee for nearly 4 years, up until 6 months ago. OpenQwaq happened after my time, and I have no more insight into the process than anyone else in the public. Any apparent insight into the situation is based on speculation, not fact.
>
>Teleplace wrote Cog, and much complaining was heard when it wasn't released instantly (although it eventually was, as promised). Now they release their *whole codebase*, but not under the license that you want. Boo-hoo.
>
>News flash: investors are in control, and they're only in it for the money. I'm thankful that people inside Teleplace worked hard to convince the investors to release the code. It's a bit pathetic to lambast them because they couldn't convince them to release it under the MIT license instead of GPL.
>
>Cheers,
>Josh
>
>
>
>
>On May 3, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>OpenQwaq is available!
>>
>><http://www.teleplace.com/company/press_releases/pr-2011_05_03.php>http://www.teleplace.com/company/press_releases/pr-2011_05_03.php
>>
>>This should be interesting!
>>
>>Ron Teitelbaum
>><http://www.3dicc.com>www.3dicc.com
>>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|