[squeak-dev] Re: Resolution of Contentious Issues
Casey Ransberger
casey.obrien.r at gmail.com
Mon May 9 07:42:06 UTC 2011
Sure. Off the top of my head, beyond namespaces, I've seen threads start and
die more than once around:
- how to get from a monolithic image to a kernel image
- whether or not to integrate with conventional SCM tools and/or how
- the un-forking/re-integration of things like Monticello
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 5/9/2011 0:07, Casey Ransberger wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking of this in part after a conversation that happened at the
>> first SSUG meeting. We talked about how we tend to argue in circles in
>> squeak-dev, while the Pharo folk set up a "working group" to make
>> decisions about stuff like this, and then as a result get to make
>> progress, even on issues which are contentious in their community.
>>
>
> Curious: Do you have a couple of examples for such issues?
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
>
--
Casey Ransberger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20110509/bb5ba46a/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|