On 2011/05/09 22:47, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
> You already cited Craig.
> You could also explore http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces
> You could see how other dialects did (VW, gst, stx, ...)
> You could read about Newspeak proposals.

Especially http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3544 which references 
http://bracha.org/newspeak-modules.pdf

frank

> Nicolas
>
> 2011/5/9 Göran Krampe<goran at krampe.se>:
>> On 05/08/2011 11:45 PM, Casey Ransberger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Craig,
>>>
>>> Sounds really interesting. FWIW I like "named" namespaces because they
>>> make searching a codebase for dependencies easier. At the end of the
>>> day, one ends up with far less namespaces than one has classes, and in
>>> my own experience, that's a lot more manageable than what we have now.
>>>
>>> That said, I'll try anything once. I've seen a *wealth* of *great* ideas
>>> about how to do namespaces in Squeak... but I've only seen one working
>>> implementation, which is at present irksomely dependent on OmniBrowser
>>
>> Well, then you haven't seen mine that was implemented way back in... 2004:
>>
>>         http://map.squeak.org/packagebyname/namespaces
>>
>> ...and I presume you didn't search SM for "Namespaces" or google it?
>>
>> Read more here:
>>
>>         http://swiki.krampe.se/gohu/27
>>
>> ...especially the "Prefixes Improved" article.
>>
>> regards, Göran
>>
>> PS. IMHO my solution is still really elegant compared to other proposals I
>> have seen. And with a bit more work it could easily do thing like remappings
>> of Namespaces etc - although since it is based on static bindings (just like
>> now) that would require "recompilation" but that doesn't feel like such a
>> big deal given those usecases.
>>
>>
>
>
>