2011/5/11 Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu>:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Germán Arduino wrote:
>
>> I don't know deeply the WebClient implementation, but is not the same
>> than in Crypto package?
>
> No, it's not.
>
>>
>> Apart of this I prefer pure image code (not relying in plugins).
>
> Both the WebClient version and the one in the Cryptography package work
> with or without plugin support.
>
>>
>> Finally, if some work ordering/renaming/etc the Crypto packages is
>> needed, let me know, I can help because I'm also doing somethings to
>> myself with these code.
>
> It depends on the community's decision.
>
>

ok, I checked the inbox and how are built the packages.

If the community decide something I can help updating the packages and
making them availables.

I personally am not sure about the better way of separate and package
all these stuff, but is a matter of discussion also.

As far as I saw exist different opinions, from maintain all together
until split in lot of different packages.

Cheers.