On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:32AM -0700, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> OK, in the end I decided on primitive number 169. It doesn't waste the
> 150-159 range and is in amongst primitiveAdoptInstance and
> primitiveSetIdentityHash.  David, would you like to integrate this into the
> main branch?

Yes certainly. To confirm: primitive 169 is available in the main branch,
and I will add your primitive shortly after you publish it in Cog.

Thanks,
Dave