[squeak-dev] Re: ifTrue: vs. ifFalse:
asqueaker at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 03:18:28 UTC 2011
Ah, now I just saw the ~= discussion, sorry..
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
> (From vm-dev list)
>> But I much prefer foo ~~ bar ifTrue: than foo == bar ifFalse:.
> Hi Eliot. May I ask why you prefer the former over the latter?
> I'm interested because I'm working on an application where the folks
> involved prefer something similar, to where they write (expr) not
> ifTrue: [ ] rather than (expr) ifFalse: [ ].
> I know you wouldn't do that but your statement definitely piqued my
> surprise and curiosity.
More information about the Squeak-dev