P.S.
 the article states
"but in spite of capturing structure, OO fails to capture behavior"

--HJH

On 8/13/12, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> the very interesting article
> http://www.artima.com/articles/dci_vision.html Gleb mentions BabyIDE,
> a demonstration of the DCI architecture
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data,_Context,_and_Interaction) done in
> Squeak by  Trygve Reenskaug, the father of MVC.
>
> (recent post
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/object-composition/sKnGrkYz3Mk[1-25]
> )
>
> The question raised is on the design level and as such does not have
> to do with Smalltalk coding only, e.g.
> http://www.fulloo.info/Examples/
>
> So maybe the question may be put that way how to apply the DCI
> approach
> (http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~trygver/themes/babyide/baby-documents.html
> ) successfully be it in Smalltalk/Squeak or another OO language?
>
> Any contributions?
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 8/13/12, Sean P. DeNigris <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gleb Averchuk wrote
>>>
>>> My result can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/newmen/monte-carlo_techs.
>>
>> Hi Gleb. This mailing list is for developers of Squeak Smalltalk. Is
>> there
>> a
>> connection between Squeak and your project? Or perhaps this is the wrong
>> list...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sean
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://forum.world.st/C-DCI-implementation-of-Monte-Carlo-techniques-tp4643879p4643952.html
>> Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>