On 18 December 2012 16:59, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> In particular, I _cannot_ version the artifact "correctly" at the
>> moment. I have seen no stamp of approval from anyone regarding my
>> ReleaseBuilder and Morphic changes, so my release process moves the
>> latest successful build (which has been tested on the Linux platform)
>> past trunk. If people are happy with what I've done so far, let's move
>> the ReleaseBuilder/Morphic inbox submissions into trunk and I'll
>> continue hacking directly on trunk.
>
> With this community, you may regard "no objection within a few days"
> as a "stamp of approval".  These changes you refer to are preferential
> in nature, they need to be moved to trunk prior to release.

Do we prefer complete histories - moving Morphic-fbs.(629, 630, 631)
into trunk - or do we only care about the final result - moving just
Morphic-fbs.631? (I prefer the latter in my own work, but trunk isn't
only my repo.)

frank