On 26 December 2012 16:16, Colin Putney <colin at wiresong.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chris Cunnington
> <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Upon inspection, it looks closely tied to the purposes of the Universes
>> packages. And as such, I think it might ought to go when Universes does.
>
>
> I don't think XML is tied to Universes; it's useful for a lot of other
> stuff.
>
> On the other hand, it would be reasonable to remove it from the base image,
> just as part of our general goal of modularization and a tiny core. I'll put
> it on my list for 4.5.

We have the seed of the other half of such a thing already, in the
ReleaseSqueakTrunk CI job. Just as we want jobs testing the CSPs, we
can make more packages unloadable and, if we consider them vital to
basic trunk hacking, simply reload them as part of preparing a trunk
image for release.

frank

> Colin