On 27 December 2012 11:55, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 December 2012 11:48, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Frank,
>>
>> On 12/27/12, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 27 December 2012 11:00, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>> where can I have a look at the build script?
>>>>
>>>> And the console output is not very talkative....
>>>>
>>>> http://squeakci.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/17/console
>>>
>>> * https://github.com/frankshearar/squeak-ci/blob/download-vms/release.sh
>>
>> OK, so the following bash script
>>
>>     #! /bin/sh
>>
>>     # This script takes the output of builtastic.sh and creates a releasable
>>     # artifact.
>>
>>     SRC=$(cd $(dirname "$0"); pwd)
>>     . "${SRC}/versions.sh"
>>     . "${SRC}/functions.sh"
>>
>>     SQUEAK_VERSION=`cat ${SRC}/target/TrunkImage.version`
>>     BASENAME=Squeak4.4-${SQUEAK_VERSION}
>>
>>     build_interpreter_vm
>>
>>     echo Using ${INTERPRETER_VM}
>>     echo Preparing ${BASENAME}...
>>     cp ${SRC}/target/TrunkImage.changes ${SRC}/target/${BASENAME}.changes
>>     cp ${SRC}/target/TrunkImage.image ${SRC}/target/${BASENAME}.image
>>
>>     chmod +w ${SRC}/target/${BASENAME}.changes
>>     chmod +w ${SRC}/target/${BASENAME}.image
>>
>>     echo Releasing ${BASENAME}...
>>     ${INTERPRETER_VM} -vm-sound-null -vm-display-null ${SRC}/target
>> /${BASENAME}.image ${SRC}/release.st
>>
>>     echo Zipping ${BASENAME}...
>>     # Previous runs might leave a zip lying around.
>>     rm ${SRC}/target/${BASENAME}.zip
>>     (cd ${SRC}/target; zip -j ${BASENAME}.zip ${BASENAME}.changes
>> ${BASENAME}.image)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CALLS the SMALLTALK script
>>
>>> * https://github.com/frankshearar/squeak-ci/blob/download-vms/release.st
>>
>>
>>     Form openAsBackground: (FileDirectory default / '..' /
>> 'resources/wallpaper.png') pathName.
>>     Workspace allInstances do: [:w | w topView delete].
>>     ReleaseBuilderFor4dot4 prepareNewBuild.
>>     Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: true.
>>
>>
>> Just by inspection (and with the knowledge that the version number of
>> the resulting image is correct) it seems that the error might be in
>> the Smalltalk script.
>
> What error? There _was_ an error, that you reported a few days, but
> that should be fixed. Have you looked at output of the
> latestSuccessfulBuild for that job?

Er, right. Maybe it would have helped me _saying_ that I'd fixed the
error you reported!

> frank
>
>> NOTE:
>> Anybody who downloads the latest trunk image and executes the above
>> Smalltalk script is in the position to find the error....... (hint,
>> hint to everybody...)
>>
>>
>>> No, the scripts are not talkative at all. I'm really not sure how to
>>> make them more talkative. Obviously in the shell scripts you can use
>>> echo, but those do hardly anything. Really what I want is something
>>> that writes to the Transcript when headful and to stdout/stderr when
>>> headless. I don't think we have such a thing at the moment.
>>>
>>> I also think that the ReleaseBuilder stuff doesn't belong in the Trunk
>>> image and should be maintained externally. (MAYBE it could be loaded
>>> into an image just as part of the release process, but really I'd like
>>> scaffolding - ConfigurationOf packages, ReleaseBuilder stuff, etc. -
>>> to not be in the image at all.)
>>
>> I am actually very fine with the scaffolding script in the image,
>> reason see the note above.
>>
>> And in addition this is what Andreas suggested in his memo which is
>> cited in the welcome window. External packages configurations /
>> scripts which are community supported should be in the image...
>>
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>>> frank
>>>
>>>> --Hannes
>>>>
>>>> On 12/24/12, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 24 December 2012 09:18, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 24 December 2012 07:48, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Though it has version number 12324 it still shows the rice-paper
>>>>>>> background and has a 'welcome to Squeak 4.3' workspace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh crumbs. Thanks, Hannes, I must have an error in my script.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://squeakci.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/17/
>>>>>
>>>>>> frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --Hannes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/23/12, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23 December 2012 19:14, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 23 December 2012 19:09, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> http://squeakci.org/job/ReleaseSqueakTrunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/target/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to automate more and more of the build/release process.
>>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/frankshearar/squeak-ci/tree/download-vms for
>>>>>>>>>> details. (I'll merge this branch back into master at some point in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> near future.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This does _not_ address Bert's issue about the positioning of the
>>>>>>>>> Squeak window; it's just an illustration of yet another piece of
>>>>>>>>> automation. I like automation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I see three dirty packages, all dirty - apparently - because of
>>>>>>>> package restructurings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * FlexibleVocabularies - FlexibleVocabularies-Info removed?
>>>>>>>> * Multilingual - Multilingual-Editor added?
>>>>>>>> * SMLoader - looks like SMLoader-Models was removed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (I may have the situation reversed; I'm not sure whether "old" refers
>>>>>>>> to the blue strikeout text or the red, nor whether "old" refers to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> image or to trunk.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> frank
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>