P.S. Maybe this is not a priority for people in regards to Squeak.
There is Cuis 4.1 available which fulfills much of this goal.
     http://www.jvuletich.org/Cuis/Index.html
     https://github.com/jvuletich/Cuis

And the number of packages available for Cuis is growing.
    https://gist.github.com/4387924

And having Environments in Squeak 4.5 is probably a higher priority....

--Hannes

On 12/28/12, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/28/12, Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/28/12 8:37 AM, "H. Hirzel" <hannes.hirzel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW is one of the Pharo builds a minimal build?
>>>
>>>   https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/
>>
>>
>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/view/Pharo-Kernel-2.0/
>
> The image is less then 3MB and has no GUI. Probably too small at the
> moment.
>>
>> Maybe the future is here?
>>
>> Too bad they focus in 2.0 which is almost incompatible with Squeak and do
>> not ends 1.4 which is not
>
> It is mainly the addition of FileSystem in Pharo 2.0 and and this is
> something which is considered as well for Squeak 4.5.
>
> So Depending on the library you are working on the porting effort is
> not all that big.
>
> There are porting issued but they may be addressed fairly easily
> depending on the type of library.
>
> The same actually applies for Cuis.
>
> General libraries have to be made independent of the distribution.
> Some libraries will only be available on a particular distribution
> because the porting effort is high.
>
> --Hannes
>