[squeak-dev] Category to be ignored by Monticello?

Colin Putney colin at wiresong.com
Tue Jan 3 19:40:33 UTC 2012

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Dave Mason <dmason at mason-rose.ca> wrote:
> I have some code that generates code on the fly in user classes.  I want them to stay in the image for efficiency reasons, but if the user class gets saved in Monticello, I don't want the generated code saved.  I can obviously put the methods in some particular category - say *auto*generated*do*not*save*. But after looking at Monticello for a bit, I can't find where it decides what to save - if, for example, it ignores things in other categories.

The easiest thing to do is create package for all your generated code,
and categorize the methods as extensions. So something like
'*dave-generated' would prevent the methods from being part of the
package to which the class belongs.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list