On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, David T. Lewis wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 07:19:18PM +0100, Mateusz Grotek wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>>  Or it will
>>> help you to build your own local repository of patches that you apply
>>> to setup your working images based on Squeak trunk.
>>>
>>
>> How to apply a patch to a squeak image? Is there a tool for that? (I
>> don't want to change the whole method, but to apply a patch only if
>> possible)
>
> Usually people will use Montecello, so they make some changes and then
> save them to the inbox repository for review. For the type of issue
> that you reported, the fix is likely to be a small snippet of code,
> so it would be perfectly fine to just make a small change set or a
> fileout of the changed method and send it here to the list (and maybe
> attach it to your Mantis report). In other words, if you have a proposed
> fix and are not sure what to do with it, just do whatever is most
> convenient for you, and refer to your Mantis bug report so people
> will have the background :)

>From licensing and integration POV the use of Monticello and the Inbox is 
preferred.


Levente

>
> I'm glad that you entered the Mantis report. That keeps the issue
> from getting lost, and even if it does not get fixed right away,
> there is a pretty good chance that someone will address it eventually.
>
> Dave
>
>
>