> Therefore, we don't need to be adding any state to PackageInfo.

Just to clarify - I'm not opposed to adding an inst-var, I just don't
see the need.

>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 26.07.2012, at 16:26, H. Hirzel wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/12, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Create a subclass of PackageInfo for your package.
>>>
>>>
>>> PackageInfo subclasses
>>>  gives
>>>
>>> {MCDirtyPackageInfo . MCEmptyPackageInfo . MCMockPackageInfo}
>>>
>>> And there seems to be no place of putting a description of the package there.
>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Chris,
>>> Could you please do an example e.g. for Monticello-Base and Monticello-Resitory?
>>>
>>> -- Hannes
>>
>>
>> If having a comment for each package is desirable then we could add it to PackageInfo just like it already supports scripts.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>