[squeak-dev] Test failures in Chronology
Chris Muller
asqueaker at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 16:43:53 UTC 2012
I see you already committed a patch. TimeStamp will be going away in 4.5.
- Chris
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> We have two test failures related to time zone offset handling:
>
> TimeStampTest>>testFromSeconds
> TimeStampTest>>testReadFromA1
>
> In #testFromSeconds, we compare a TimeStamp created from an integer seconds
> to another TimeStamp created from strings. They are intended to refer to
> the "same" time stamp, but one has a time zone offset and the other has
> the offset set to zero (UTC), more or less like this:
>
> tsFromStrings := TimeStamp date: ('1-10-2000' asDate) time: ('11:55:00 am' asTime).
> tsFromStrings. ==> 10 January 2000 11:55 am
> tsFromStrings offset. ==> 0:00:00:00
>
> tsFromIntegerSeconds := TimeStamp fromSeconds: 3124958100.
> tsFromIntegerSeconds. ==> 10 January 2000 11:55 am
> tsFromIntegerSeconds offset. ==> 0:01:00:00
>
> I believe that the discrepancy is related to the change we did in trunk here:
>
> Name: Kernel-cmm.671
> Author: cmm
> Time: 10 February 2012, 4:58:49.106 pm
>
> Decided against the localized vs. globalized mode. Timespans created in
> the context of an offset will start in that offset. When no context is
> available, the defaultOffset for Timespans must be zero. For example,
> two ways to make a Date for today:
> Date today. 'start is midnight at offset zero. Will compare
> successfully to other Date today results.'
>
> DateAndTime now asDate. 'In this case, the start is midnight of the
> local time-zone. It can only compare equally to Dates of its time-zone.'
>
> I am not sure how this should be handled. Chris, can you comment?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|