On 2012-11-07, at 17:18, David Corking <lists at dcorking.com> wrote:

> These tools are great and I look forward to using them.
> 
> Is there any chance one of them could be adopted by ESUG or the
> Software Freedom Conservancy?
> 
> I don't wish anyone ill. Nevertheless, it could be a problem if an
> important domain name or server one day came under the control of
> creditors/courts/executors, through no fault of those who have kindly
> donated the resources and expertise. I am told this has happened to
> projects like ours in the past.


Well, the main Squeak server is now owned by the SFC, and we are in the process of setting up a few more (just got a new one for the build server). While we are working on getting active projects migrated to squeaksource3, we are also planning to set up another read-only backup mirror for squeaksource.com, like the one in Chile, though hopefully with the meta data intact. Help welcome - hop over to the box admins list.

- Bert -