Yes, indeed.

And in particular I suggest to go for a fluid layout, so that it looks
fine on smaller screens

http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/examples/fluid.html

With Firefox 15.0 for example you have a new menu option
   Web developer / Responsive web design
where you can easily choose different screen sizes and have a look how
the site renders for various screen sizes.

This does not use much time in terms of Smalltalk as it is all CSS. It
will give us a modern web site.

In any case, Chris,  thank you very much for going for an Altitude web
site. It is good to have a test site. We were well served by Aida in
the past but giving the new framework a chance is fine as well.

---Hannes


On 11/20/12, Chris Cunnington <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-11-20 9:59 AM, radoslav hodnicak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Chris Cunnington
>> <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com <mailto:smalltalktelevision at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     - Chris C. has developed a prototype of a new squeak.org
>>     <http://squeak.org> homepage. It's latest version can be found at
>>     [7]. It is an Altitude website. There are questions about the site
>>     on two fronts: how it looks; and, how stable it is. There has been
>>     doubt about how the site should look. Opinions about its design,
>>     logo, layout, CSS, etc. are welcome. Herbert Konig is helping to
>>     harden it with the Selenium testing suite. [8] [9] The most recent
>>     image has been up for +200 hours without a problem. Colin has
>>     added changes to Altitude, which will be deployed soon.
>>
>>
>> I would suggest using Twitter's Bootstrap framework, it's easy to
>> adopt and the defaults look reasonably pleasant even when a programmer
>> puts the site together.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rado
>>
>>
> http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/
>
> A good tip. Thanks.
>
> Chris
>