Jenkins reliability ( was Re: [squeak-dev] 6 tests to go...)

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 17:09:50 UTC 2012


On 24 October 2012 18:06, Chris Cunnington
<smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-10-24 10:45 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>>> Err, no.
>>> A "workspace" is where slave doing its work.
>>> But artifacts made by job(s) are stored in separate place.
>>
>>
>> Right, but as I said, the directory structure created by Jenkins didn't
>> match what the wiki says when we set up Jenkins. So, tt's still worth
>> checking the directory structure.
>>
>>
>> Levente
>>
>
> The directory structure seems to be as it should be:
>
> xxxxxxxxx:/xxxxxxxxx/jobs/SqueakTrunk/builds/20$ ls -la
> total 864
> drwxr-xr-x  3 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:26 .
> drwxr-xr-x 21 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:21 ..
> drwxr-xr-x  3 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:26 archive
> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx   2906 Oct 23 19:26 build.xml
> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx    252 Oct 23 19:21 changelog.xml
> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx 857130 Oct 23 19:26 junitResult.xml
> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx   1312 Oct 23 19:26 log
>
> The deliverables are in the archive directory as expected. I think the
> build.xml is what is read to inform the web page.
>
> Looking at the site it seems a bit more stable than yesterday. Somewhat.
> Nothing has disappeared so far. Perhaps it's hardening a bit with use.

The glue's setting?

frank

> Chris
>


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list