Jenkins reliability ( was Re: [squeak-dev] 6 tests to go...)

Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 17:11:52 UTC 2012


On 2012-10-24 1:09 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 24 October 2012 18:06, Chris Cunnington
> <smalltalktelevision at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2012-10-24 10:45 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Err, no.
>>>> A "workspace" is where slave doing its work.
>>>> But artifacts made by job(s) are stored in separate place.
>>>
>>> Right, but as I said, the directory structure created by Jenkins didn't
>>> match what the wiki says when we set up Jenkins. So, tt's still worth
>>> checking the directory structure.
>>>
>>>
>>> Levente
>>>
>> The directory structure seems to be as it should be:
>>
>> xxxxxxxxx:/xxxxxxxxx/jobs/SqueakTrunk/builds/20$ ls -la
>> total 864
>> drwxr-xr-x  3 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:26 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 21 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:21 ..
>> drwxr-xr-x  3 jenkins xxxxxx   4096 Oct 23 19:26 archive
>> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx   2906 Oct 23 19:26 build.xml
>> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx    252 Oct 23 19:21 changelog.xml
>> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx 857130 Oct 23 19:26 junitResult.xml
>> -rw-r--r--  1 jenkins xxxxxx   1312 Oct 23 19:26 log
>>
>> The deliverables are in the archive directory as expected. I think the
>> build.xml is what is read to inform the web page.
>>
>> Looking at the site it seems a bit more stable than yesterday. Somewhat.
>> Nothing has disappeared so far. Perhaps it's hardening a bit with use.
> The glue's setting?
>
> frank
The epoxy. Yes.

Chris


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list