[squeak-dev] ObjectsAsMethodsExample = cruft?

H. Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 14:41:47 UTC 2012

I think this is far from being obvious. It could remain in the image.
Other option is to have a help class with notes with pointers to
entries like


Actually without additional explanation as in the web  link given
above it is difficult to see the need for ObjectsAsMethods.

So to summarize: This is a valuable thing which makes Smalltalk
outstanding and people should be pointed to this either by having an
example in the image or a reference in the help system or one of the
help workspaces.


On 8/31/12, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> I note ObjectsAsMethodsExample in the trunk image. Given the much more
> featureful http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectsAsMethodsWrap/, should
> this guy really be in the image? (I guess it's OK, in the sense as
> being a minimal working example of something not obvious.)
> Maybe it could go into its own unloadable package?
> frank

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list