[squeak-dev] The Trunk: Kernel-ul.709.mcz
colin at wiresong.com
Fri Sep 7 18:15:59 UTC 2012
Levente Uzonyi replied to Tobias Pape:
> When you use reflection, then you know anything can happen. If it's exposed
> via a single message, then you'll probably think it's okay to access it.
>> The point is that the
>> self ensureEnvironment.
>> env …
>> relies too much on side-effects, imho.
>> Two things here:
>> 1) what is the harm of exposing the dictionary?
>> If you use it, you are guilty nonetheless
> If the environment dictionary is accessed from another process, then things
> can go really bad.
But isn't this true regardless of whether the dictionary is exposed?
Can a process can damage the environment of another process by sending
Another idea would be to expose some kind of scope object that had a
more specific protocol than Dictionary and could protect against bad
things happening. That would be available through a lazy initializer.
If we did it in 4.5, it would complement the introduction of
Environment, which does something similar for global variables.
More information about the Squeak-dev