On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> > This "feature" is misguided because a class can belong to multiple
> packages. So asking a class for its single package info is wrong.
>
> (Why such strong words?)  A class can only be defined in one package,
> just as in Monticello, and this method simply associates its MC
> equivalent to PackageInfo domain objects.  Why do you say a class can
> belong to multiple packages -- because of extensions?


 A class *can* be part of multiple packages.

Imagine you have two packages, 'Foo' and 'Foo-Bar'. All the classes that
belong to 'Foo-Bar' are also part of 'Foo'.

Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20130403/0fc9b369/attachment.htm